I agree that Nashville AND Florida need to go along with Columbus and Carolina. i feel that the NHL needs LA and Atlanta. i still feel after 26 years that the flames should never have left atlanta after 1979-80.the league needs to put teams back in quebec and winnipeg and hartford. even kansas city,but no seattle.Canuck said:There are some current NHL citys I think need to move and get out of where they are right now, and move to a city with a bigger market and more intrested in hockey. Florida and nashville are the two teams i think have no buisness being where they are. you could definetly move those 2 teams to citys like seattle, winnipeg, quebec city, hell maybe even a team in wisconson would be good, or even Indianapolis. I am still undecided on whether or not Atlanta or Carolina should have a team. They're both doing really well but atlanta and carolina arent really hockey crazy citys. And Los Angeles and Anahiem are 30 mins away from each other at most? whats the need for 2 nhl city to be so close even though they can do it because of the population in that area is so big.
I would like to hear other peoples thought on which teams should be moved or just stay where they are.