Hockey Fan Forums banner
1 - 1 of 1 Posts

26,388 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Canadian Press
Oct 20, 2006, 1:35 AM EDT

SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) - Captain Patrick Marleau scored two of San Jose's five power-play goals and the Sharks rolled to the best start in franchise history with their sixth victory in seven games, 5-1 over the sloppy Detroit Red Wings on Thursday night.

Milan Michalek, Mark Bell and Marleau scored in the first 15 minutes to chase Detroit goalie Chris Osgood. Jonathan Cheechoo and Marleau added third-period goals as the Sharks tied their club record for power-play scores, set last February in another home game against Detroit.

Vesa Toskala made 21 saves to remain unbeaten this season, but lost the chance for his first shutout on Jiri Hudler's goal with 8:52 to play.

San Jose still easily improved to 6-1 for the first time in franchise history, surpassing its 5-2 start to the 1994-95 season by taking advantage of Detroit's 16 penalties.

Rookie Matt Carle had two assists to take the NHL scoring lead among defencemen, and Michalek moved into the team lead in scoring with a goal and two assists for the Sharks, who have scored 28 goals this season - another franchise record after seven games. They're unbeaten in four home games, and blew a three-goal lead in their only loss at Edmonton last week.

Toskala wasn't challenged much while winning his fourth straight start in his platoon with Evgeni Nabokov, who has two shutouts already this season.

Detroit, which won 12 of its first 13 games last season on the way to the Presidents' Trophy, is just 3-3-1 this season. One night after committing 14 penalties and giving up three power-play goals in a 4-1 loss to Anaheim, the Red Wings were mistake-prone again on the third stop of a four-game road trip.

San Jose scored on its first three power-play opportunities, with Michalek starting it off with his team-leading sixth goal. Bell deflected home a shot by Carle, and Marleau added his second of the year three minutes later.

1 - 1 of 1 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.