So who is the next guy to go after Kane after a dominating fight like this?
Kane vs Cooke
I know most of you have probably already seen this, but for those of you who said Cooke had it coming for the hit he put on Savard, you're right. Here's karma, in the form of a right hook from Evander Kane. enjoy
http://www.hockeyfights.com/fights/94177
http://www.hockeyfights.com/fights/94177
1 - 6 of 42 Posts
I'm not saying they go after him because of fighting Cooke or that they will plan it. What I was asking is who will want to fight him after his impressive KO.is there a reason to go after Kane who punished a guy nearly everyone in the league hates? to establish some sort of a domination in the league or something? I don't think Kane wanted to do anything: Cooke got what was coming to him from the least suspected opponent. I mean, anyone can go after anyone in any given game. do you, guys, think that players actually plan in off-season who they are going after next season? even in the days of goons policing the ice it was never the case unless retribution was on order for prior misbehavior.
my bad then as I did not read through the whole post... I just hate Cooke so much like he personally did something to me.
Maybe you should start doing that. It would lead to a lot less confusion on both sides. I was simply asking who people thought would be the next guy to fight Kane after his impressive KO and yet you bring up all these points that have nothing to do with my question.maybe partially... even still, I somewhat relayed the opinion that, in this league, anyone can go after anyone at any given point in a game. there's always another tough guy out there on some other team.
was it a rhetorical question, in essence then? in that case, it is pointless.
:laugh: No need to get all defensive. And I'm fine with two good answers to my question as it was just a question about some predictions.you should not tell people what to do. obviously, lack of response to your question should be your answer...
You've said my question is pointless and now you are calling me arrogant all for what? I simply suggested that you read the whole post to cause less confusion and you take it the completely wrong way. I am pretty sure that everyone hear would agree with me that you should read the whole post and if you don't want to still, that's fine.if responding to someone's arrogance is a display of being defensive, sure, call it that.
Okay, I'm done with this as it is getting this thread way too off topic and is going no where. Once again, I wasn't trying to have the whole site vs. you, just thought I'd suggest reading the whole post since you admitted yourself you didn't read it which caused confusion and you also didn't seem to understand my question from what you said, as someone else already pointed out.it is not what you said, it is how you said it. my admitting to what I should or should not do does not require your approval. no need to try to recruit others on this thread to defend you either...
1 - 6 of 42 Posts
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Hockey Fan Forums
A forum community dedicated to Competitive Hockey players and enthusiasts. Fan Discussion of NHL Hockey, College Hockey, the Olympics, Major Juniors, the NHL Draft Forum and more!
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
Recommended Communities
