Quote:
Originally Posted by Montreal_Goalie39
JT I was abit disappointed about the Poti call but I accepted that.
|
Sure, they why make a big deal about it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montreal_Goalie39
The goal allowed with Huet way out of his crease was completely unacceptable there's nothing that you can say about that. That was pretty disgusting.
|
What was disgusting about it? You constantly see goaltender interference calls (against the Flyers anyway) where the offensive player is pushed into the the opposing goaltender (which is the wrong call), so why should a call be made when the defenseman is pushed into his own goaltender? If the league says the call is right, then the call is right and there's nothing you can say. It was two guys fighting for space for the puck. Tough. How is it goaltender interference in the opponent never touches the goaltender?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montreal_Goalie39
Prucha how can you say who cares about the refs? The 08 post season showed some pretty bad referee decisions and some of the worst were in the flyers-capitals series.
|
Mostly in favor of the Caps.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montreal_Goalie39
Again.. allowing the goal when Huet was pushed way out of his crease was quite stupid.
|
That's your opinion, not what's actually in the rules.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montreal_Goalie39
Thorosen pushed a defender right into Huet. If the NHL says thats fine, how can they be taken seriously?
|
Just because you don't like the rule doesn't mean the league can't be taken seriously.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montreal_Goalie39
If you want to get technical, if Thorosen had smacked Huet with his stick across the throat, and Huet falls to the ice and lets in a goal, it should certainly be allowed, I mean hey, Thorosen didn't touch Huet, his stick did.
Be reasonable.
|
You be reasonable, that's not how the call would go, that'd be either high sticking or goaltender interference. Last I checked, high sticking is called even though the player didn't touch the opponent, his stick did, but that's the rule. Or is that a stupid rule that makes the league impossible to take seriously, too?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montreal_Goalie39
By the way JT, what are you, a keyboard warrior? Calm down please. We're here to discuss hockey, not to display our internet ego's.
|
By the way, let's see how this started:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montreal_Goalie39
So the main prerequisite to be MOTM nowadays here is to be an idiot?
JT your either blind or dumb or possibly both to not acknowledge that the referees had an important role in the outcome of the flyers-capitals series.
the goal in game 7 where huet was pushed out of his crease was quite obviously an example of this.
Either your too biased or too blind to acknowledge that, you choose.
Those kind of referee decisions is what is killing hockey and making it hard to sell in the states, it's a joke.
|
Looks like you started this nonsense by being an ass. You can disagree with an opinion without being a jerkoff. So, next time you want to talk about internet commandos, think before you type. Ask yourself, would I say this to a person's face if we were having this conversation in person?
The Habs are going to win the Stanley Cup
Linear Mode
