I am in a pool where there is trading between people. Toward the end of the season some of the people that have no chance are trading their best players for the top teams worse players to give them a better chance of winning. I think this is stupid because someone will win because they can convince someone to give them their players and not because of what they know. The person in charge of teh league voided the deals as they were not fair deals. I think he did the right thing. What are your thoughts?
The league had a rule that in order for trades to go through there was a league wide vote. The problem is when the trades were made most people were out of it so they didn't care to vote against it. Last year i got screwed because i didn't do this and the person who won did so i made a move this year to keep this from happening then went to the person in charge and told him it was stupid and was for him not allowing them